Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 129 days older than Ryzen 3 2200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 15 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen 3 2200U - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200U - 28 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 2200U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 28 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
