Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 2892 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Phenom II X4 925 - 230 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
28.495102404274263%
Multi-Core
930
19.5132186319765%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |