Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 2852 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than Phenom II X4 925 - 168 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 16 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
168
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
FPS and Value Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Ryzen 7 1700X
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
29.411764705882355%
Multi-Core
930
16.68460710441335%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Deneb | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
