Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3700 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield IV than Phenom II X4 830 - 423 vs 364 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
423
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£564.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £564.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Deneb | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |