Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 5242 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 33% better in Ready or Not than Phenom II X4 830 - 304 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 32 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
304
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.58/FPS
100%
Price, £
£481.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £481.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2022 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |