Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3894 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Phenom II X4 830 - 124 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.91/FPS
100%
Price, £
£237.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £237.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Deneb | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |