Buy on Amazon
£141
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2400 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2400 is 884 days older than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 170 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than FX-9590 - £74.99 vs £141.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - £0.44 vs £0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
169
99.41176470588235%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
53.01204819277109%
Price, £
£141
53%
AMD FX-9590 Vishera 8-Core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W FD9590FHHKWOF Desktop Processor - Black
Buy for £141 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2582 minutes ago
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
170
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.44/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Sandybridge i5-2400 Core i5 Quad-Core Processor (3.10GHz, 6MB Cache, Socket 1155)
Buy for £74.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2582 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 220 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 23.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
