Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1696 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 42% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - £74.99 vs £128.82
- Up to 40% better value when playing League of Legends than Celeron G3900 - £1.15 vs £1.92 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in League of Legends than Core i5-2400 - 67 vs 65 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 51 vs 95 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
65
97.01492537313433%
Value, £/FPS
£1.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £74.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2746 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
67
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.92/FPS
59.89583333333333%
Price, £
£128.82
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |