Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 855 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-4350 - 187 vs 184 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
187
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£25.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £25.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 708 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |