Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2217 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9590 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
128
92.7536231884058%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£141
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £141 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6827 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |