Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8350 vs Core i9-10900

FX-8350 vs Core i9-10900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2746 days newer than FX-8350.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900

  • Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8350 - 172 vs 155 FPS
  • Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra+

AMD FX-8350 Logo
FX-8350

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

155

90.11627906976744%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

172

100%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

£474.99

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900 (base clock: 2.80GHz; socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) box BX8070110900

Buy for £474.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra+

AMD FX-8350 Logo
FX-8350

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8350 Logo
FX-8350

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

488

28.638497652582164%

Multi-Core

1995

23.690773067331673%

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1704

100%

Multi-Core

8421

100%

AMD FX-8350

vs

Intel Core i9-10900

Oct 23rd, 2012Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
FXCollectionCore i9
VisheraCodenameComet Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8Cores
10
8Threads
20
4.0 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.8 GHz
4.2 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.2 GHz
125 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
20.0xMultiplier
28.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.