Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £273.32 vs £395.04
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £2.0 vs £2.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900 - 158 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 24 vs 20 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
86%
Value, £/FPS
£2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£273.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £273.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.5/FPS
80%
Price, £
£395.04
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for £395.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |