Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Core i9-10900 - 232 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £475.99 vs £839.38
- Up to 50% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10900 - £2.05 vs £4.07 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 32 vs 20 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £839.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2881 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
232
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£475.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £475.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2880 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |