Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 729 days older than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 7% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-8320E - 76 vs 71 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
76
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |