Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2681 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 44% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320E - 127 vs 88 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
