Key Differences
In short — FX-8320E outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320E is 124 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G1840 - 178 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
177
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |