Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3499 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than FX-8150 - 126 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
