Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2087 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than FX-8150 - 228 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 64 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | EPYC |
| Zambezi | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
