Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 781 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8150 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
