Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 1707 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6300 - 135 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 20 vs 6 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£450
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |