Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2814 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 41% better in Dead Island 2 than FX-6300 - 166 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £470 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75781 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |