Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - £35.24 vs £155.5
- Up to 74% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600 - £0.19 vs £0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than FX-6100 - 213 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6130 minutes ago
Buy for £155.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |