Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £155.5 vs £280.13
- Up to 38% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-13600K - £0.67 vs £1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-11600 - 260 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
232
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£155.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £155.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9233 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
260
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.08/FPS
62%
Price, £
£280.13
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for £280.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |