Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1982 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 125 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 10% better in Remnant II than FX-4350 - 86 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 48 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
78
90.69767441860465%
Value, £/FPS
£0.77/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 48 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
