Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-4300 vs Core i9-10900

FX-4300 vs Core i9-10900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2746 days newer than FX-4300.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900

  • Performs up to 165% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-4300 - 61 vs 23 FPS
  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 20 vs 4 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Immortals of Aveum.
Immortals of Aveum

Immortals of Aveum

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-4300 Logo
FX-4300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

23

37.704918032786885%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

61

100%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

£474.99

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900 (base clock: 2.80GHz; socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) box BX8070110900

Buy for £474.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 170 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-4300 Logo
FX-4300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-4300 Logo
FX-4300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

448

26.291079812206576%

Multi-Core

1090

12.943830898943117%

Intel Core i9-10900 Logo
Core i9-10900

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1704

100%

Multi-Core

8421

100%

AMD FX-4300

vs

Intel Core i9-10900

Oct 23rd, 2012Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
FXCollectionCore i9
VisheraCodenameComet Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
10
4Threads
20
3.8 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.8 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.2 GHz
95 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
19.0xMultiplier
28.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.