Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3683 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 26% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-4130 - 401 vs 317 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 20 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Core i5-13600KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
