Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700K - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Valheim than EPYC 7742 - 229 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 125 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£362.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £362.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |