Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 902 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than EPYC 7742 - 239 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 58 vs 225 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
239
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£73.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £73.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |