Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1246 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Ready or Not than EPYC 7742 - 290 vs 260 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
