Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1036 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than EPYC 7551P - 201 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13003 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |