Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 292 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Need For Speed Unbound than EPYC 7282 - 147 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 95 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
147
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£419.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19605 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |