Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 335 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than EPYC 7282 - 125 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 105 vs 120 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.99/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16032 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rome | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |