Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 2479 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-8350 - 255 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| EPYC | Collection | FX |
| Rome | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
