Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 776 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £100.0 vs £270.37
- Up to 58% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-12400 - £0.3 vs £0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 14% better in Overwatch 2 than Athlon 3000G - 378 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15910 minutes ago
Buy for £270.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |