Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900K is 294 days older than the more expensive Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-12400 - 132 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £258.88 vs £270.37
- Up to 6% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-12400 - £1.96 vs £2.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £270.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14705 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.96/FPS
100%
Price, £
£258.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |