Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2103 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 104% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1610 - 100 vs 49 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
100
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14752 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |