Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Vibox II-17 outperforms the cheaper Veno Scorp on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Vibox II-17 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 75% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Veno Scorp - 14 vs 8 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Veno Scorp - £89.35 vs £106.24 per FPS
Advantages of Veno Scorp Gaming PC
- Up to 32% cheaper than Vibox II-17 - £849.95 vs £1249.95
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £1,249.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1498 minutes ago
Buy for £849.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-10700F
null-core
Single-Core
1612
100%
Multi-Core
7231
100%
CPU Winner
Vibox II-17 Gaming PC | vs | Veno Scorp Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10400F | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
