The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 20% less energy – 120 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
60%
Min 1% FPS
22
50%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, £
£618.12
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.44/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£618.12
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£712.65
In Stock
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
35%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
44%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
44%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
