The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only £133.48 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 18% cheaper – £618.12 vs £751.60
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 120 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
80%
Min 1% FPS
44
76%
Price, £
£618.12
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.44/FPS
97%
Buy on Amazon
£618.12
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£712.65
In Stock
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, £
£751.6
82%
Value, £/FPS
£7.22/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
64%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
70%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
56%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
56%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
