The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 150 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
30%
Min 1% FPS
22
21%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
103
100%
Price, £
£700.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.19/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£700.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£796.34
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,103.53
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£794.06
In Stock
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
36%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
13%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
7%
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.48 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 198 GPixel/s |
74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 554.4 GTexel/s |
2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.48 TFLOPS |