Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 1030 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 1030 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 776 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 1030.
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GT 1030 - 62 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of GeForce GT 1030
- Up to 49% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - £68.99 vs £134.36
- Up to 48% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - £1.13 vs £2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 30 vs 65 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
62
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.17/FPS
52%
Price, £
£134.36
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for £134.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
FPS
61
98%
Value, £/FPS
£1.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£68.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
88%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
23.49 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
35.23 GTexel/s
85%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | GeForce GT 1030 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | May 17th, 2017 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$199 | MSRP | $79 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1228 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1468 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1502 MHz |