The GeForce GT 1030 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 240 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only £37.03 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GT 1030
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Up to 48% cheaper – £39.95 vs £76.98
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon R7 240 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 1030
May 17th, 2017
Average FPS
46
100%
Min 1% FPS
19
100%
Price, £
£76.98
51%
Value, £/FPS
£1.67/FPS
58%
Buy on Amazon
£76.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£99.28
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£81.54
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£76.84
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£97.50
In Stock
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
89%
Min 1% FPS
16
84%
Price, £
£39.95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.97/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon R7 240 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon R7 240 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon R7 240 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 1030
May 17th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
65%
Pixel Fillrate
23.49 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
35.23 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.127 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
24%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
40%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
40%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 1030 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $79.00 | MSRP | $69.00 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 30 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 48.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
23.49 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 5.6 GPixel/s |
35.23 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 14 GTexel/s |
1.127 TFLOPS | FP32 | 448 GFLOPS |
