The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only £94.05 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 73% cheaper – £34.99 vs £129.04
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 31 vs 65 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, £
£129.04
27%
Value, £/FPS
£2.63/FPS
33%
Buy on Amazon
£34.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£39.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£161.94
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
7%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
2%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
