The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 250 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only £50.10 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- Up to 38% cheaper – £81.06 vs £131.16
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 250 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, £
£131.16
61%
Value, £/FPS
£2.67/FPS
72%
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
86%
Min 1% FPS
16
76%
Price, £
£81.06
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.93/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 250 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 250 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 250 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
30%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
71%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
71%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
57%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
$199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 14.8 GPixel/s |
41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 29.6 GTexel/s |
1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 947.2 GFLOPS |