Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is 1318 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
- Performs up to 3300% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 34 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile - 35 vs 80 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
28%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
22%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| GeForce 30 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
336 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
| 900 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1425 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
