Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 1132 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 93% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 35 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 53% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 52 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
29%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
21%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $1499 |
| 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
