Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 560 XT outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 560 XT is 647 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 560 XT - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 560 XT
- Performs up to 160% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 39 vs 15 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 13th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
49%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
28%
Desktop • Mar 13th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
39.23 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
137.3 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 560 XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 13th, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Polaris |
$149 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1074 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1226 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |