Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce MX450 25W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1815 days older than GeForce MX450 25W.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 25 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 6% better in War Thunder than GeForce MX450 25W - 227 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W - 4 vs 2 GB
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
GeForce MX450 25W
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX450 25W
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
46%
Texel Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
20%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 930 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
