Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 680 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 680 is 1900 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Performs up to 15% better in Borderlands 3 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 55 vs 48 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 - 35 vs 195 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
GeForce GTX 680
Desktop • Mar 22nd, 2012
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 680
Desktop • Mar 22nd, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
33.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
135.4 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
57%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| $499 | MSRP | $149 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1006 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 1058 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
