Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 638 days newer than GeForce GTX 650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 65 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 148% better in Control than GeForce GTX 650 - 52 vs 21 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 - 4 vs 1 GB
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce GTX 650
Desktop • Nov 27th, 2013
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 650
Desktop • Nov 27th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
8.464 GPixel/s
13%
Texel Fillrate
33.86 GTexel/s
13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1058 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
